Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia

2020
Authors
Dimitrijević, Aleksandra
Gavrilović, Marija

Ivanović, Sanjin
Mileusnić, Zoran

Miodragović, Rajko

Todorović, Saša
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Increased demand for food production, influenced by the constant growth of population, resulted in the agricultural production systems that are more energy and economy intensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the energetic and economic efficiency of sugar beet and wheat production. Attention was given to the fertilizer usage and its share in energy consumption since it can amount to 50%. Data show that energy input in wheat production was 5.84 MJ.kg(-1) and in sugar beet it was 0.93 MJ.kg(-1). The highest share of energy input both in wheat and sugar beet was observed for fertilizers, 52.45% and 46.70%, respectively. Economic analysis has shown that wheat production is a low profitable production with a net return of only 20.69 USD.ha(-1), in comparison with sugar beet production with a net return of 513.53 USD.ha(-1). Costs related to the fertilizer use prevailed in total variable and total production costs. Economic analysis has also shown that the benefit-to-cost ratio was h...igher in sugar beet production (1.33) compared to wheat production (1.03). Furthermore, it was determined that these economic indicators were less sensitive in sugar beet production than in wheat production regarding the variation of fertilizer.
Keywords:
energy efficiency / sensitivity analysis / benefit-to-cost ratio / wheat / sugar beetSource:
Energies, 2020, 13, 9Publisher:
- MDPI, BASEL
Funding / projects:
- The Improvement and Preservation of Biotechnology Procedures for Rational Energy Use and Improvement of Agricultural Production Quality (RS-31051)
- Rural Labour Market and Rural Economy of Serbia - Income Diversification as a Tool to Overcome Rural Poverty (RS-179028)
DOI: 10.3390/en13092361
ISSN: 1996-1073
WoS: 000535739300239
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85084935541
Collections
Institution/Community
Institut za povrtarstvoTY - JOUR AU - Dimitrijević, Aleksandra AU - Gavrilović, Marija AU - Ivanović, Sanjin AU - Mileusnić, Zoran AU - Miodragović, Rajko AU - Todorović, Saša PY - 2020 UR - http://RIVeC.institut-palanka.rs/handle/123456789/298 AB - Increased demand for food production, influenced by the constant growth of population, resulted in the agricultural production systems that are more energy and economy intensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the energetic and economic efficiency of sugar beet and wheat production. Attention was given to the fertilizer usage and its share in energy consumption since it can amount to 50%. Data show that energy input in wheat production was 5.84 MJ.kg(-1) and in sugar beet it was 0.93 MJ.kg(-1). The highest share of energy input both in wheat and sugar beet was observed for fertilizers, 52.45% and 46.70%, respectively. Economic analysis has shown that wheat production is a low profitable production with a net return of only 20.69 USD.ha(-1), in comparison with sugar beet production with a net return of 513.53 USD.ha(-1). Costs related to the fertilizer use prevailed in total variable and total production costs. Economic analysis has also shown that the benefit-to-cost ratio was higher in sugar beet production (1.33) compared to wheat production (1.03). Furthermore, it was determined that these economic indicators were less sensitive in sugar beet production than in wheat production regarding the variation of fertilizer. PB - MDPI, BASEL T2 - Energies T1 - Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia IS - 9 VL - 13 DO - 10.3390/en13092361 ER -
@article{ author = "Dimitrijević, Aleksandra and Gavrilović, Marija and Ivanović, Sanjin and Mileusnić, Zoran and Miodragović, Rajko and Todorović, Saša", year = "2020", abstract = "Increased demand for food production, influenced by the constant growth of population, resulted in the agricultural production systems that are more energy and economy intensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the energetic and economic efficiency of sugar beet and wheat production. Attention was given to the fertilizer usage and its share in energy consumption since it can amount to 50%. Data show that energy input in wheat production was 5.84 MJ.kg(-1) and in sugar beet it was 0.93 MJ.kg(-1). The highest share of energy input both in wheat and sugar beet was observed for fertilizers, 52.45% and 46.70%, respectively. Economic analysis has shown that wheat production is a low profitable production with a net return of only 20.69 USD.ha(-1), in comparison with sugar beet production with a net return of 513.53 USD.ha(-1). Costs related to the fertilizer use prevailed in total variable and total production costs. Economic analysis has also shown that the benefit-to-cost ratio was higher in sugar beet production (1.33) compared to wheat production (1.03). Furthermore, it was determined that these economic indicators were less sensitive in sugar beet production than in wheat production regarding the variation of fertilizer.", publisher = "MDPI, BASEL", journal = "Energies", title = "Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia", number = "9", volume = "13", doi = "10.3390/en13092361" }
Dimitrijević, A., Gavrilović, M., Ivanović, S., Mileusnić, Z., Miodragović, R.,& Todorović, S.. (2020). Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia. in Energies MDPI, BASEL., 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092361
Dimitrijević A, Gavrilović M, Ivanović S, Mileusnić Z, Miodragović R, Todorović S. Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia. in Energies. 2020;13(9). doi:10.3390/en13092361 .
Dimitrijević, Aleksandra, Gavrilović, Marija, Ivanović, Sanjin, Mileusnić, Zoran, Miodragović, Rajko, Todorović, Saša, "Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia" in Energies, 13, no. 9 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092361 . .